Learner Survey

Age Confirmation

I confirm I am 18 years of age or older.

Participant Code (Optional)

To compare your responses over time without collecting personal data, we use an anonymous code. This is optional but recommended.

Your Participant Code

If you already have a code from a previous visit, enter it below. Otherwise, click "Generate Code" to create one that will be saved on your device.

About You

This information helps us understand who is using the resource. No personal identifiers are collected.

Which best describes your current context?

Broad region where you are based

Discipline / professional area (optional)

Your Usage

Approximately how long did you spend on the resource today?

How did you access the resource?

Learning Outcomes

Please rate your understanding before and after using the resource today. Use "N/A" if a statement doesn't apply to you.

1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Applied Questions

These short questions help us understand how you engage with the concepts in the resource.

Question 1: Applied Critique

You are reviewing a visitor-facing panel about Hashima that emphasises engineering innovation and community resilience, with a single sentence acknowledging wartime labour.

Which is the strongest evidence-based critique?

A. "The panel is biased because it focuses on negative aspects of Japan." B. "The panel frames history selectively: it foregrounds industrial achievement while minimising coercion, which affects accountability and interpretation." C. "The panel is wrong because all heritage panels should be neutral." D. "The panel should add more photographs."

Follow-up (1–2 sentences): What specific additional information or framing would you add, and why?

Question 2: Evidence vs Interpretation

Which of the following is closest to a claim that requires evidential support rather than being a design/interpretive choice?

A. "We used ambient sound to create an immersive mood." B. "The island's population peaked in year X at approximately Y residents." C. "We chose to keep the tour under 10 minutes." D. "We used a monochrome aesthetic to evoke archival photography."

Question 3: Soft Gatekeeping

Which practices could function as "soft gatekeeping" in heritage interpretation? (tick all that apply)

Requiring advanced booking with limited slots Burying forced labour discussion in a hard-to-find subpage Publishing only selective archival materials without disclosure of selection criteria Providing interpretive content only through a paid guided tour

Impact on Your Practice

These questions help us understand the real-world impact of the resource.

1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

As a result of using this resource, I am more likely to use it in my studies/work.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

As a result of using this resource, I am more likely to approach contested heritage narratives with explicit attention to evidence and omission.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Your Feedback (Optional)

Reminder: Please do not include names or identifying details.

What was most valuable, and what should we improve?

Stay Connected (Optional)

Would you be willing to be contacted for a brief follow-up about how you used the resource? This helps us gather evidence of real-world impact for research assessment.

May we contact you for follow-up?

Yes No

Simulating Silence

🔒 Age Verification Required

About This Survey

Age Confirmation

Participant Code (Optional)

Your Participant Code

About You

Your Usage

Learning Outcomes

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Applied Questions

Question 1: Applied Critique

Question 2: Evidence vs Interpretation

Question 3: Soft Gatekeeping

Impact on Your Practice

Your Feedback (Optional)

Stay Connected (Optional)

🔄 Withdrawal Information