Module 08
Social Media and Digital Memory
How platforms shape contested heritage narratives
This module extends the archive of obstruction into digital spaces. It examines the online environment in which Hashima's contested heritage circulates — a context that shaped the HashimaXR project but extends beyond the institutional dynamics documented in Modules 00–07.
Overview
- The 2017 film Battleship Island transformed Hashima from a bilateral diplomatic issue into a transnational digital memory war
- Visual platforms (Instagram, TikTok, gaming) depoliticise Hashima through the ruin aesthetic — circulation without context
- YouTube has become the primary battleground for competing historical claims, with denialist content accumulating hundreds of thousands of views
- Japanese revisionist groups have adapted memory activism techniques for denialist purposes through nostalgic counter-memory
- Platform content policies regarding historical denialism remain Eurocentric — Asian wartime atrocities lack equivalent protection
This module examines how social media platforms have transformed the Hashima controversy from a bilateral diplomatic dispute into a distributed, ongoing, and deeply personal form of memory activism. Unlike the soft gatekeeping explored in Module 08, social media introduces new dynamics: algorithmic amplification, visual virality, the mobilisation of nostalgic counter-memories, and the strategic deployment of personal testimony as political evidence.
The Digital Battleground
In July 2017, the South Korean blockbuster film Battleship Island (군함도) opened in cinemas across Asia. Within weeks, it had become the focal point of an intense digital memory war. Japanese politicians, activists, and bloggers mobilised to counter what they characterised as historical distortion. Korean civic groups amplified testimonies of forced labour. YouTube filled with competing video testimonies. Twitter hashtags in Japanese, Korean, and English drew users into transnational debates about what really happened on Hashima Island.
The Hashima Digital Ecosystem
Hashima Island exists simultaneously in multiple digital spaces, each presenting a distinct version of the site's history. Understanding how these spaces interact reveals the architecture of digital memory contestation.
The Ruin Aesthetic
Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest: #gunkanjima has accumulated millions of views. Images emphasise dramatic decay — crumbling concrete, rust-stained walls, nature reclaiming infrastructure. Comments focus on atmosphere and photography technique, not history.
Virtual Heritage
Fortnite's "Gunkanjima Archive" (code: 4058-6239-4733), Skyfall's villain lair, Google Street View: each remediation presents opportunities for interpretation — and each has declined to engage with forced labour.
The Testimony Wars
YouTube has become the primary battleground. Search results for "軍艦島" reveal a fragmented landscape — survivor testimonies, nostalgic recollections, and denialist content compete for attention and algorithmic promotion.
The Ruin Aesthetic: Visual Virality Without History
Search for "Gunkanjima" or "Battleship Island" on Instagram, TikTok, or Pinterest and you will encounter thousands of images emphasising the island's dramatic decay. This visual circulation operates largely independent of historical context. The ruin aesthetic positions Hashima as a site of sublime decay, inviting contemplation of transience and abandonment. The island becomes what scholars call "ruin porn" — visually compelling precisely because it has been stripped of difficult history.
This is not accidental. The visual framing of Hashima as photogenic ruin serves particular interests. It aligns with tourism promotion, with the Gunkanjima Digital Museum's emphasis on technological nostalgia, and with Japan's official heritage narrative that celebrates Meiji-era industrial achievement while bracketing the wartime period. When users share dramatic images of Hashima, they participate — often unknowingly — in a mode of circulation that depoliticises the site.
Gaming and Virtual Heritage
In January 2025, the city of Nagasaki and the Heritage Databank project announced that Hashima had been recreated as an explorable environment in Fortnite's creative mode. The "Gunkanjima Archive" was presented as a form of digital preservation, allowing users to explore areas normally off-limits to physical visitors.
The Fortnite recreation exemplifies how digital heritage can reproduce the silences of physical heritage interpretation. Players can explore the island's architecture in unprecedented detail while encountering nothing about the Korean and Chinese workers who died there. The platform's emphasis on exploration and play naturalises this absence. Users experience Hashima as an atmospheric environment, not as a site of historical atrocity.
Digital Heritage as Soft Gatekeeping
The Fortnite recreation raises important questions about what counts as heritage preservation. The Heritage Databank project frames its work as "digital archiving" — preserving fragile sites against decay, disaster, and restricted access. This framing positions digital reconstruction as politically neutral technical work.
Yet choices about what to preserve, how to present it, and what contextual information to include are never neutral. A digital Hashima without historical interpretation is not a neutral preservation of the physical site; it is an active choice to reproduce the interpretive silences that characterise the physical heritage experience.
This constitutes what we might call digital soft gatekeeping — extending the procedural obstruction documented in Module 08 into virtual environments.
YouTube: The Testimony Wars
If Instagram and gaming platforms depoliticise Hashima through aesthetic framing, YouTube has become the primary battleground for competing historical claims. A search for "軍艦島" (Gunkanjima) or "Hashima forced labor" reveals a fragmented landscape of historical interpretation.
On one side, Korean broadcasters, documentary filmmakers, and civic groups have uploaded testimonies of forced labour survivors, historical analyses, and responses to Japanese denialism. The release of Battleship Island generated extensive Korean-language content, including historian Choi Tae-sung's widely viewed lecture contextualising the film within scholarly research on wartime mobilisation.
On the other side, Japanese conservative commentators, the National Congress of Industrial Heritage, and the "Hashima Islanders for Historical Truth" have produced extensive counter-content. The website "The Truth of Gunkanjima" (gunkanjima-truth.com), operated by the National Congress, hosts video testimonies from former Japanese residents asserting that no discrimination occurred.
A 2020 investigation by Korea Bizwire found that searching Japanese terms for "forced laborers" on YouTube returned videos presenting denialist narratives, some with hundreds of thousands of views. Such content benefits from YouTube's algorithmic tendency to recommend increasingly extreme material to engaged viewers.
Case Study: The YouTube Ecosystem in Practice
Examining specific videos reveals how the digital memory war operates in practice. Consider four categories of content currently circulating:
Nostalgic Community Documentation
Videos like 端島(軍艦島)記録映像「祭・運動会・物価安定運動」 (Nagasaki Tourism, 2015, 10 min) present archival footage of festivals, sports days, and daily life. The comprehensive documentary 軍艦島の記録 (36 min) features testimonials from former residents about rooftop activities and infrastructure — framing the island through lived domestic experience rather than industrial labour history. Extended seasonal footage appears in 「続・島の四季」 (27 min).
Revisionist "Truth-Seeking" Content
The channel "軍艦島の真実 朝鮮人徴用工の検証" (The Truth of Gunkanjima: Verification of Korean Conscripted Workers) produces investigative content directly challenging forced labour narratives. "負の遺産"軍艦島はNHKの捏造から始まった (21 min, 2020) questions the authenticity of underground mining scenes in a 1955 NHK documentary, arguing that negative heritage narratives originated from media fabrication. More recent content like 【軍艦島】検証・ある朝鮮人労務者の証言 (2024, 21 min) presents "critical analysis" of survivor testimonies — employing scholarly language while working to discredit forced labour accounts.
Heritage and Decay Documentation
Videos like 【世界遺産】軍艦島 産業遺産を歩く (Galileo X, 2021, 25 min) explore the island's structural remains within the UNESCO World Heritage framework. Evacuation footage in 軍艦島1974 全島民退去 (8 min) documents the mass exodus, while 「軍艦島」1975年 (22 min) captures decay one year later. These operate within the ruin aesthetic, presenting abandonment as atmospheric spectacle.
Transnational Circulation
Chinese-language content like 日本最繁榮小島居民一夕消失!軍艦島淪鬼城… (2024, 12 min) frames Hashima through the lens of urban legend and "ghost city" fascination, further depoliticising the site for international audiences unfamiliar with Japan-Korea historical disputes.
Memory Activism in the Platform Age
The Hashima case illuminates how social media has transformed memory activism — both progressive efforts to recover suppressed histories and reactionary efforts to reassert nationalist narratives.
Counter-Memory Mobilisation
For Korean civic groups and descendants of forced labourers, social media has provided tools to contest Japan's official heritage narrative. The 2017 release of Battleship Island was accompanied by an extensive digital campaign. CJ Entertainment released supplementary educational content, including interviews with historians and activists. The hashtag campaigns surrounding the film helped transform Hashima from an obscure industrial site into an internationally recognised symbol of Japanese wartime atrocities.
Social media has also enabled the circulation of survivor testimonies beyond their original archival contexts. Clips from documentary interviews, excerpts from oral history projects, and statements from elderly survivors have been shared across platforms, often with translations that enable transnational circulation. This democratisation of testimony distribution challenges the institutional gatekeeping that previously controlled access to survivor voices.
Nostalgic Counter-Memory
Memory activism techniques adapted for denialist purposes
The National Congress of Industrial Heritage, led by Katō Kōko, mobilises former Japanese residents of Hashima to provide testimonies of:
- Happy childhoods and community solidarity
- School festivals, movie screenings, shared baths
- Excitement about modern conveniences like television
- Benevolent corporate welfare from Mitsubishi
These testimonies appropriate the emotional registers of survivor testimony — personal experience, lived memory, authentic witness — while inverting their political function. Rather than recovering suppressed histories, they work to re-suppress them.
The Double Standard of Oral History
Selective treatment of testimony based on political convenience
The Industrial Heritage Information Center in Tokyo relies heavily on video testimonies from former Japanese residents. These are presented as authoritative evidence that no discrimination occurred.
Yet the same organisations dismiss Korean and Chinese survivor testimonies as unreliable, arguing that:
- Memories are "too vague"
- Survivors' accounts contain inconsistencies
- Documentary evidence is lacking
This double standard — treating Japanese childhood memories as self-evidently credible while subjecting survivor testimonies to impossible evidentiary demands — reveals the political rather than historical character of the denialist project.
Production Values as Credibility
Social media amplifies the asymmetry between different types of testimony. The polished production values of the National Congress videos contrast with the often lo-fi quality of older survivor interviews. The former are optimised for platform circulation; the latter were recorded for archival purposes. The visual grammar of digital content — high resolution, professional editing, compelling narrative structure — becomes an informal marker of credibility, regardless of historical accuracy.
Transnational Circulation and Platform Governance
The Hashima controversy demonstrates how heritage disputes are increasingly shaped by transnational digital flows and the governance decisions of platform companies.
Language Boundaries and Filter Bubbles
Despite the global reach of social media, the Hashima memory war operates primarily within linguistic communities. Japanese-language content circulates among Japanese users; Korean-language content circulates among Korean users. English-language content, while smaller in volume, serves as a bridge — and a contested space where both sides seek to influence international opinion.
This linguistic fragmentation means that users in different countries encounter radically different versions of Hashima's history. A Japanese user searching YouTube is likely to encounter nostalgic testimonies and critiques of Korean "fabrication." A Korean user searching the same platform will find survivor testimonies and historical documentaries. Neither is likely to encounter the other's content unless they actively seek it.
Platform Responsibility
The role of platform companies in mediating this memory war raises difficult questions. YouTube, TikTok, and other platforms have developed policies regarding hate speech, misinformation, and historical denialism — most notably in relation to the Holocaust. But these policies have not been consistently applied to Japanese wartime atrocities.
Content denying the forced labour history of Hashima remains widely available across platforms. Unlike Holocaust denial, which is explicitly prohibited in many jurisdictions and flagged by platform moderation systems, forced labour denial operates in a regulatory grey zone. The testimonies presented by the National Congress are framed not as denial but as alternative memory — a framing that exploits the legitimate complexity of oral history while serving denialist purposes.
The Eurocentric Development of Content Policies
This regulatory gap reflects both the political sensitivity of Japan-Korea relations and the Eurocentric development of platform content policies. What counts as historical denialism worthy of moderation has been defined primarily with reference to European history — the Holocaust, Armenian genocide, and more recently the Srebrenica massacre.
Asian historical atrocities remain comparatively unprotected. Denial of Japanese wartime forced labour, the Nanjing Massacre, or Unit 731's human experimentation does not trigger the same content warnings or removal protocols. This asymmetry is not evidence of lesser historical significance but of which histories have achieved sufficient political visibility to shape platform governance.
For educators and heritage professionals, this regulatory gap creates particular challenges. Students researching Hashima online will encounter denialist content presented with the same visual authority as scholarly sources — often with higher engagement metrics.
Implications for Digital Heritage
The Persistence of Visual Silence
Physical heritage interpretation at Hashima is characterised by soft gatekeeping — the procedural management of access that excludes difficult histories without explicit censorship. Digital platforms, despite their apparent openness, reproduce and often amplify these silences. The ruin aesthetic that dominates Hashima's visual circulation online performs a kind of digital soft gatekeeping. It does not prohibit historical content; it simply overwhelms it.
Testimony as Weapon
The strategic deployment of personal testimony by both sides of the Hashima debate reveals how the democratisation of voice enabled by social media can be turned against its emancipatory promise. Survivor testimony, long central to memory activism and transitional justice, becomes just another content type competing for attention alongside its negation.
The Limits of Virality
The 2017 Battleship Island film successfully raised international awareness of forced labour history. But its impact has been contested, contained, and in some ways reversed by sustained revisionist counter-mobilisation. Virality is a moment; memory is a process. The platforms that enable rapid circulation of counter-hegemonic content also enable its rapid contestation.
Further Reading
Scholarly Sources
- Jung, S. and Kim, K.H. (2021). "Battleship Island and the transnational dynamics of cultural memory between South Korea and Japan." Memory Studies.
- Nakano, R. (2021). "Mobilizing Meiji nostalgia and intentional forgetting in Japan's World Heritage promotion." International Journal of Asian Studies, 18: 27–44.
- Dionisio, A. (2023). "Memories of Bathtubs and Apples: Touring the Industrial Heritage Information Center, Tokyo." Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus.
- Johnsen, N. (2021). "Katō Kōko's Meiji Industrial Revolution — Forgetting forced labor to celebrate Japan's World Heritage Sites." Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. Parts 1 and 2.
Primary Sources
- UNESCO/ICOMOS (2021). Report on the mission to the Industrial Heritage Information Center, Tokyo.
- The Truth of Gunkanjima website (gunkanjima-truth.com) — examine critically as primary evidence of revisionist strategy.
- Nagasaki zainichi Chōsenjin no jinken wo mamoru kai (2016). Gunkanjima ni mimi wo sumaseba [If You Listen Carefully to Gunkanjima]. Tokyo: Shakai Hyōronsha.
Key Takeaways
- Visual platforms depoliticise through aesthetics. The ruin aesthetic that dominates Instagram and gaming recreations strips Hashima of difficult history while appearing to celebrate it.
- YouTube hosts active testimony wars. Denialist content accumulates significant viewership and competes directly with survivor testimonies for algorithmic visibility.
- Nostalgic counter-memory inverts memory activism. Japanese revisionist groups have adapted progressive techniques to re-suppress rather than recover suppressed histories.
- The double standard of oral history serves political purposes. Japanese childhood memories are treated as self-evidently credible while survivor testimonies face impossible evidentiary demands.
- Platform content policies remain Eurocentric. Asian historical atrocities lack the content moderation protections that European atrocities have achieved.
📝 Cite This Module
Gerteis, Christopher. "Social Media and Digital Memory." HashimaXR Learning Resource. SOAS University of London, 2025–2026. https://hashimaxr.netlify.app/learn/social-media/.
For other formats, see How to Cite · Full Bibliography